Historical Archive
Browse past probability snapshots — last 30 updates
| Actor | Positive | Negative | Trend | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | 10% | 90% | 30% | |
| Iran | 10% | 90% | 28% | |
| Israel | 85% | 15% | 18% | |
| China | 75% | 25% | 12% | |
| Pakistan | 55% | 45% | 7% | |
| Weighted Avg | 36% | 64% | — | 100% |
The provisional ceasefire between the US and Iran is expiring without a resolution to the critical dispute over the Strait of Hormuz. Iran continues to assert its right to levy tolls for transit, a demand the US consistently rejects. Diplomatic efforts, primarily facilitated by Pakistan, are ongoing, with indirect talks aiming to extend the ceasefire and find common ground. However, the lack of a substantive agreement on maritime transit rights maintains a high risk of renewed conflict, despite some reports of oil tankers exiting the Strait during the temporary calm.
Diplomatic efforts to extend the provisional ceasefire between the US and Iran remain active but have not yielded a breakthrough on the core dispute regarding the Strait of Hormuz. Signals indicate that indirect talks, with Pakistan acting as a key facilitator, are continuing, as evidenced by reports of Pakistani delegations meeting in Tehran and US officials like Vance leading discussions in Islamabad. However, the primary point of contention, Iran's demand for transit tolls through the Strait and the US's firm rejection of such demands, appears unresolved.
Iran's stance, as reflected in earlier reports of Tehran agreeing to reopen the Strait but concurrently seeking to charge ships for crossing, indicates a strategic objective to leverage its geographic position for economic or political gain. The US position, articulated by statements from the White House, emphasizes unimpeded passage without limitation, including tolls. This fundamental disagreement is the primary driver of the high conflict probability.
While some reports note oil tankers exiting the Strait during the fragile ceasefire period, this does not signify a resolution, but rather a temporary operational adjustment under specific conditions. The expiration of the current ceasefire without a new agreement on the Strait's status leaves the region vulnerable to renewed tensions and potential maritime interdiction. The continued high tension level in the Strait of Hormuz, with IRGC naval units maintaining a visible presence, underscores the fragility of the current situation and the elevated risk of escalation.
The immediate outlook indicates a high probability of renewed conflict following the imminent expiration of the provisional ceasefire, driven by the unresolved dispute over Strait of Hormuz transit tolls. Without a significant and rapid diplomatic breakthrough on the issue of tolls, the risk of direct confrontation remains elevated, with maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz as the primary flashpoint.
- [01]Status of US-Iran indirect talks and any new proposals regarding Strait of Hormuz transit.
- [02]IRGC naval activity and any attempts to enforce tolls or interdict commercial shipping in the Strait.
- [03]Statements from US and Iranian leadership regarding the ceasefire's extension or breakdown.
- [04]Movements of US naval assets, particularly carrier strike groups, in the Persian Gulf.
- [05]Oil market reactions and global shipping insurance rates in response to Strait of Hormuz developments.
